Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

main: provide the way to specify data taype in --_fielddef option #4178

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

masatake
Copy link
Member

This is a preparation step for implementing optscript operators getting and setting parser-specific fields.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 20, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.94%. Comparing base (e2308b0) to head (1461664).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4178   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.93%   85.94%           
=======================================
  Files         241      241           
  Lines       59115    59142   +27     
=======================================
+ Hits        50803    50830   +27     
  Misses       8312     8312           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

--_list-fielddef-flags option is added, too.

Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <[email protected]>
@masatake masatake force-pushed the main--datatype-in-fielddef branch from 0582c06 to 1461664 Compare January 20, 2025 22:15
@masatake masatake changed the title main: provide the way to specify data taype in --_fielddeff option main: provide the way to specify data taype in --_fielddef option Jan 21, 2025
@masatake masatake merged commit f5d1b76 into universal-ctags:master Jan 21, 2025
82 checks passed
{
$datatype .= "FIELDTYPE_BOOL";
}
elsif (($1 eq 'bool+str') || ($1 eq 'str+bool'))
Copy link
Member Author

@masatake masatake Jan 22, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bool+str should be rejected.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant