Swap about into index and index into posts

website/index.qmd

@@ -1,16 +1,82 @@
 ---
-title: Posts
-listing:
-  contents: posts
-  sort: "date desc"
-  type: default
-  categories: true
-  sort-ui: false
-  filter-ui: false
-page-layout: full
+title: "The Unjournal data blog"
+image: logo.png
+about:
+  template: marquee
+  links:
+    - icon: github
+      text: Github
+      href: https://github.com/unjournal/unjournaldata
 aliases: 
   - chapters/evaluation_data_analysis.html
-title-block-banner: true
 ---
 
+[The Unjournal](https://www.unjournal.org) coordinates the public evaluation of 
+papers and research projects. We are working independently of traditional academic 
+journals to build an open platform and a sustainable system for feedback, ratings, 
+and assessment. Our initial focus is quantitative work that informs global priorities, 
+especially in economics, policy, and other social sciences. We will encourage better 
+research by making it easier for researchers to get feedback and credible ratings on 
+their work. Our aim is to make rigorous research more impactful, and impactful 
+research more rigorous.
 
+This site hosts the [Unjournal data blog](posts.html). Our main web site,
+[unjournal.org](https://www.unjournal.org), and
+our [knowledge base](https://globalimpact.gitbook.io/the-unjournal-project-and-communication-space)
+explain and present our vision, procedures and progress. The 'output' evaluations, 
+including feedback and discussion, can be found on our 
+[PubPub page](https://unjournal.pubpub.org/), and are indexed in scholarly archives.
+
+We also have interactive dashboards:
+
+- [here](https://unjournal.shinyapps.io/DataExplorer/)
+
+- [and here](https://unjournal.shinyapps.io/uj-dashboard/)
+
+
+This site and the accompanying dashboards present data and analysis on The Unjournal's 
+pipeline and evaluation output. We use them to:
+
+1. Keep track of what we are covering, when and how.
+
+2. Present the quantitative evaluations in useful ways.
+
+3. Benchmark, check, and aggregate the expert judgment of our evaluators 
+   as reflected in their ratings and predictions.
+
+
+We may expand this analysis further in the future, e.g., to include 
+
+- Further analysis of the relevant research contexts (e.g., 'how many papers are 
+  coming out by field')
+
+- Connections to replications and prediction initiatives.
+
+- Comparing and benchmarking our evaluations against 
+  'traditional publication outcomes' for the evaluated work, such as journal tiers
+  and citations.
+
+
+This resource aims to be:
+
+1. Dynamic: Regularly updated to reflect our progress
+
+2. Transparent and replicable: sharing data and code to permit checking and 'forked' analyses
+
+3. Interactive: presenting a dashboard-style interface, allowing readers to choose their analyses of interest.
+
+
+20 May 2024: David Reinstein, Julia Bottesini, and David Hugh-Jones have done most of the analysis 
+here and in the accompanying dashboards.
+
+
+### Data explorer {-}
+
+::: column-body-outset
+
+```{=html}
+
+<iframe height="900" width="120%" frameborder="no" src="https://unjournal.shinyapps.io/DataExplorer/"> </iframe>
+
+
+```

website/posts.qmd

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+---
+title: Posts
+listing:
+  contents: posts
+  sort: "date desc"
+  type: default
+  categories: true
+  sort-ui: false
+  filter-ui: false
+page-layout: full
+aliases: 
+  - chapters/evaluation_data_analysis.html
+title-block-banner: true
+---
+
+