Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reimplementing dtr with generic overloading. #62

Open
wants to merge 35 commits into
base: 21-3-2-orig
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MarisaKirisame
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #{issue number}

TORCH_CHECK(count == make_raw_result.outputs.size());
}

// todo: i can also use a torch library impl instead of calling fallback explicitly. should i do that?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah just use torch library impl, that's what it's for

std::vector<bool> checkpoint_reversed_ivalue_in_mutable;
// but should we really reverse stuff? there is a peek() function which doesnt.
// ezyang seems to want to replace stack impl from std::vector to some sort of list,
// so slower peek() though.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't reverse it. Stack is always going to be contiguous memory. You can iterate the other direction to avoid reversing.


// map over the tensor in the ivalue.
// weird stuff. seems like i cant write a generic function over all list :(
template<typename F>
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

optimization: use fallback for all other then istensorlist/istensor/istensoroptionlist

std::vector<bool> checkpoint_tensors_in_mutable;
auto it = checkpoint_reversed_ivalue_in.rbegin();
auto mit = checkpoint_reversed_ivalue_in_mutable.rbegin();
while (it != checkpoint_reversed_ivalue_in.rend()) {
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove reverse - much simpler

// the only way to construct/destruct an IValue should be map_ivalue.
void CheckpointFallback(const c10::OperatorHandle& op, torch::jit::Stack* stack) {
size_t before_size = stack->size();
auto s = op.schema();
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

only call op.schema() once

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants