-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 277
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
check for nil #351
check for nil #351
Conversation
Hi Ben,
Which environment is this? Because your change breaks the build for all currently supported environments (Darwin, Linux). |
Hi Thomas, it was a docker build. I can try to find more details. That's very strange.
|
Same. Confused me for a minute since when I cloned the repo and looked for the line that was the issue, it was "gone" :) |
Are you experiencing the build issue with the current release version or did you build some state of |
The build issue does occur with the latest release. The build issue does not occur when building the latest commit from the Which is why a new release would be really appreciated here. |
Fixes #
Changes proposed in this PR
fseeko(result, 0, SEEK_END)
will fail to build if result is optional. Added a requirement for result to be non-nilTests performed
Further info for the reviewer
Open Issues