Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency tailwindcss to v4 #4778

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 25, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
tailwindcss (source) ^3.4.17 -> ^4.0.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

tailwindlabs/tailwindcss (tailwindcss)

v4.0.0

Compare Source

[4.0.0] - 2025-01-21


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "* * * * 0,6" (UTC), Automerge - "* 0-3 * * *" (UTC).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot added dependencies ui frontend related labels Jan 25, 2025
@qwerty287 qwerty287 force-pushed the renovate/tailwindcss-4.x branch from f07fa9c to e08157e Compare January 25, 2025 06:49
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Jan 25, 2025

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@qwerty287
Copy link
Contributor

@woodpecker-ci/maintainers I started the migration, but it's not working yet. It complains about a lot of unknown utility classes. Their upgrade tool didn't work that good.

@xoxys
Copy link
Member

xoxys commented Jan 25, 2025

Looks like they changed basically everything... Feels like yet another framework migration 😞

@qwerty287
Copy link
Contributor

I fixed most issues now I think. What I found that doesn't work yet are the ::before classes we use on the active pipelines counter and the check and radio boxes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies ui frontend related
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants