remove SharedValue #322
Merged
remove SharedValue #322
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a breaking change to the raw-api feature.
I looked at the history of SharedValue. It was introduced to fix #10 to circumvent some pointer shenanigans.
I looked through the code and couldn't find anything relevant anymore. All pointers in a RefMut are derived from
&mut Vand never convert through&V, thus we never have a case where&V -> &mut V.I have tested with miri too, which would definitely complain if this is violated.
(this is a pre-requisite for some later changes I wish to make, see #314)