chore(go): fixed deepsource issues #3
Conversation
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @cnlangzi - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
General suggestions:
- Consider the broader impact of changing the return types and order on existing codebases that use this library, ensuring backward compatibility or providing a clear migration path.
- Review the simplification of context setup in test cases to ensure it does not affect the intention of the tests.
- Evaluate the performance implications of the early return in the
WaitNmethod for various use cases to ensure it meets the needs of all consumers.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- 🟡 General issues: 3 issues found
- 🟢 Security: all looks good
- 🟢 Testing: all looks good
- 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
- 🟢 Docstrings: all looks good
Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨
| @@ -8,11 +8,11 @@ type Awaiter[T any] interface { | |||
| // Add add a task | |||
| Add(task func(context.Context) (T, error)) | |||
| // Wait wail for all tasks to completed | |||
| Wait(context.Context) ([]T, error, []error) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code_refinement): Changing the order of return types for the Wait, WaitAny, and WaitN methods improves consistency with Go's conventional error handling, where the error is typically the last return value. This change enhances readability and aligns with common Go practices.
| Wait(context.Context) ([]T, error, []error) | |
| // Wait waits for all tasks to be completed. It returns a slice of results, a slice of errors for individual tasks that failed, and an error if the waiting process itself encounters an error. | |
| Wait(context.Context) ([]T, []error, error) |
| @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ func TestWait(t *testing.T) { | |||
| }{ | |||
| { | |||
| name: "wait_should_work", | |||
| ctx: func() context.Context { return context.Background() }, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (code_refinement): Simplifying the ctx field in test cases by directly assigning context.Background instead of wrapping it in a function enhances clarity and reduces unnecessary complexity. This change makes the test setup more straightforward.
| ctx: func() context.Context { return context.Background() }, | |
| ctx: context.Background(), |
Fixes