Refactor : src/components/CheckIn/CheckInWrapper.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest

[abbi4code]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Migrated tests for checkInWrapper component from Jest to Vitest. Updated test framework and adjusted test implementations accordingly. All tests now use Vitest for consistent testing environment and improved performance.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2495

Did you add tests for your changes?
yes

Snapshots/Videos:

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Added a comment outlining the purpose and coverage of unit tests for the CheckInWrapper component.

• Style

  • Changed test case identifier from test to it for consistency with common testing conventions.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on refactoring the CheckInWrapper.spec.tsx test file from Jest to Vitest. The changes involve adding a documentation comment to explain the purpose of the tests and changing the test case identifier from test to it, which aligns with common testing conventions. The core logic and functionality of the tests remain unchanged, maintaining the existing test coverage and behavior.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/components/CheckIn/CheckInWrapper.spec.tsx	Added documentation comment and changed test case identifier from test to it

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Replace Jest-specific functions with Vitest equivalents [#2495]	✅
Rename from test.tsx to spec.tsx [#2495]	✅
Maintain 100% test coverage [#2495]	✅

Possibly related issues

• Refactor : src/components/CheckIn/CheckInModal.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2494 (CheckInModal.test.tsx Vitest refactoring): Similar Vitest migration pattern
• Refactor : src/components/CheckIn/TableRow.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest #2496 (TableRow.test.tsx Vitest refactoring): Part of the broader Vitest migration effort

Suggested labels

refactor

Suggested reviewers

• varshith257

Poem

🐰 A test file hops to Vitest's beat,
Transforming code with a rhythmic feat
From Jest to Vitest, smooth and light
Refactoring tests with pure delight
Code coverage dancing, 100% bright! 🧪

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a16e02e and f6f89f5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/components/CheckIn/CheckInWrapper.spec.tsx (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Learnings (1)

📓 Common learnings

Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.

🔇 Additional comments (2)

src/components/CheckIn/CheckInWrapper.spec.tsx (2)

16-27: Well-documented test coverage!

The added JSDoc comment block clearly explains the purpose and scope of the test suite, which improves maintainability.

---

36-36: Successfully migrated to Vitest syntax

The change from test to it aligns with Vitest conventions while maintaining the original test logic.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
   1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
   1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
   2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
   3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.29%. Comparing base (a16e02e) to head (f6f89f5).
Report is 7 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2709      +/-   ##
====================================================
+ Coverage             82.81%   86.29%   +3.47%     
====================================================
  Files                   295      312      +17     
  Lines                  7274     8134     +860     
  Branches               1592     1841     +249     
====================================================
+ Hits                   6024     7019     +995     
+ Misses                 1012      943      -69     
+ Partials                238      172      -66     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.