Improving Code Coverage in src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx #3370
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request enhances the unit tests for the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (2)
382-438: Consider reducing test duplicationThe new test cases are well-structured but contain duplicated setup code. Consider extracting common setup into a helper function:
const renderOrganizationCard = (props: any) => { return render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}> <BrowserRouter> <Provider store={store}> <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> <OrganizationCard {...props} /> </I18nextProvider> </Provider> </BrowserRouter> </MockedProvider> ); }; const waitForJoinButton = async () => { await waitFor(() => expect(screen.getByTestId('joinBtn')).toBeInTheDocument()); };This would simplify the tests to:
it('Displays error when user is already a member', async () => { const errorProps = { ...props, id: '3' }; renderOrganizationCard(errorProps); await waitForJoinButton(); fireEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('joinBtn')); await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('AlreadyJoined'); }); });
382-438: Consider adding tests for additional edge casesTo further improve coverage, consider adding tests for:
- Network errors (timeout, connection loss)
- Multiple rapid clicks on the join button (debounce/throttle)
- Component unmount during pending request
Example test case for network timeout:
it('Handles network timeout gracefully', async () => { const networkErrorMock = { request: { query: SEND_MEMBERSHIP_REQUEST, variables: { organizationId: '5' }, }, error: new Error('Network timeout'), }; const customLink = new StaticMockLink([...MOCKS, networkErrorMock], true); const errorProps = { ...props, id: '5' }; render( <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={customLink}> {/* ... rest of the providers ... */} </MockedProvider> ); await waitForJoinButton(); fireEvent.click(screen.getByTestId('joinBtn')); await waitFor(() => { expect(toast.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith('networkError'); }); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx(6 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Check Python Code Style
- GitHub Check: Test Application
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.spec.tsx (2)
2-8: LGTM! Good choice usingwaitForUsing
waitForis the recommended approach for testing asynchronous operations, as it provides better reliability than fixed timeouts.
97-116: Verify error message consistency with component implementationThe error mocks are well-structured, but please verify that the error messages match exactly what the component expects:
'User is already a member'should trigger the'AlreadyJoined'toast'Some unexpected error occurred'should trigger the'errorOccured'toastRun this script to verify error message consistency:
✅ Verification successful
Error handling implementation is consistent ✅
The error messages in the mocks correctly trigger the corresponding toast notifications:
- GraphQL error "User is already a member" →
'AlreadyJoined'toast- GraphQL error "Some unexpected error occurred" →
'errorOccured'toast🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check error message handling in OrganizationCard component # Search for error handling in the component echo "Searching for error handling in OrganizationCard component..." rg -A 5 "toast.error|toast\(['|\"]error" src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx # Search for error message definitions echo "Searching for error message definitions..." rg -g "*.{json,ts,tsx}" "AlreadyJoined|errorOccured"Length of output: 2512
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3370 +/- ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage 7.95% 89.79% +81.83%
=====================================================
Files 312 335 +23
Lines 8105 8612 +507
Branches 1801 1898 +97
=====================================================
+ Hits 645 7733 +7088
+ Misses 7393 623 -6770
- Partials 67 256 +189
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@palisadoes Sir I think its done now you can merge |
MayankJha014
changed the title
palisadoes
merged commit a32533b
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
Issue: #3070
Increasing code coverage of OrganizationCard.
Summary by CodeRabbit