Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v4 subset update to include variant QC #539

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

jkgoodrich
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@@ -280,11 +341,18 @@ def main(args):
overwrite=args.overwrite,
)
ht = adjust_vcf_incompatible_types(ht)
mt = mt.annotate_rows(info=ht[mt.row_key].info)

info_expr = ht[mt.row_key].info
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So I hit this when I made a subset back in October but VRS is a struct within the info and hails export VCF does not like that. Given the timeline and us being in the middle of production, KC and I decided to drop the annotation. I think we could drop or remove the struct when we are delivering a VCF?

Copy link
Contributor

@mike-w-wilson mike-w-wilson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM -- just one thing with the info field and VRS struct for VCF export that will need to be fixed but didnt want to hold you up where I will be out the remainder of the week and its a small change.

@mike-w-wilson mike-w-wilson merged commit 468b13b into main Feb 16, 2024
2 checks passed
@mike-w-wilson mike-w-wilson deleted the jg/v4_subset_update_variant_qc branch February 22, 2024 13:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants