Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 9, 2024. It is now read-only.

Add MPIJob to configurator #203

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Akado2009
Copy link
Contributor

@Akado2009 Akado2009 commented Jun 18, 2019

Partly addresses: #195


This change is Reviewable

xyhuang and others added 2 commits June 5, 2019 18:35
- Fix versions of dependencies
- Clean up with go mod tidy
- Deleted old clientset that blocks go mod
- Modified codegen script to work with go mod
started modifier
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign swiftdiaries
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @swiftdiaries in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Member

@xyhuang xyhuang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you merge #202 (which includes package updates) first and rebase on top of that? also added some minor comments. Thx.

@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ func (c *Configurator) Run(opt *AppOption) error {
log.Errorf("Cannot unmarshal config spec: %s", opt.InputParams)
return err
}
log.Printf("%+v", configSpec)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove this?

@@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ func (c *Configurator) Run(opt *AppOption) error {
// If the namespace in the ManifestModSpec is empty valued, replace it with
// configurator's own namespace which is same as the workflow. This is for
// cases when the ManifestModSpec is created before namespace is set.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove this?

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
'{"gen": {"manifestFrom": { "path": "/home/akado2009/go/src/github.com/kubeflow/kubebench/controller/examples/mpi-job.yaml"}}, "mod": {"namespace": "kubebench", "volumes": [{"name": "example"}]}}'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this useful?

@googlebot
Copy link

So there's good news and bad news.

👍 The good news is that everyone that needs to sign a CLA (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) have done so. Everything is all good there.

😕 The bad news is that it appears that one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter. We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that here in the pull request.

Note to project maintainer: This is a terminal state, meaning the cla/google commit status will not change from this state. It's up to you to confirm consent of all the commit author(s), set the cla label to yes (if enabled on your project), and then merge this pull request when appropriate.

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

@xyhuang
Copy link
Member

xyhuang commented Jun 26, 2019

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

@Akado2009: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
kubeflow-kubebench-presubmit 39eae9a link /test kubeflow-kubebench-presubmit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@Akado2009 Akado2009 closed this Jul 1, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants